Two quick wins
The two fixes below were sitting in plain sight in the data, both losing sales, until someone read it closely enough to catch them.
A menu name that was quietly costing sales. Sous Chef caught that adding the word “Small” to the Pita Chips had dropped that item's orders 48%, because “Small” reads as low value. The owner renamed the other “Small” items to “Side” items, and the change earned the sales back.
A packaging problem, not a recipe problem. One item kept drawing refunds tagged cold and soggy. Sous Chef's read was direct: fix the packaging, not the food. The owner changed the packaging, and the next period that item went from four refund cases to zero.
Neither fix cost much, and both delivered a tangible return within 30 days.
Sous Chef does this for every restaurant
Most restaurants never open the reports the delivery platforms give them, because there is no time. Sous Chef reads all of it for you, across every location and platform: every order, refund, review, promo dollar, and kitchen metric. It reports back weekly, monthly, and quarterly, so a problem does not sit for weeks unnoticed.
Then it tells you the handful of things worth acting on, ranked by what they are worth in revenue. It is not a dashboard you have to study. It shows you the specific moves that make more money on the platforms, and the ones to skip. The two wins above are the kind of thing it surfaces routinely. The next example shows what it does when a month goes wrong.
The month sales dropped 9%
One period, delivery sales fell 9%. On a dashboard that looks like a bad month, and the usual reaction is to spend your way out of it with more promotions.
Sous Chef found the real cause. The drop was not customers spending less per order, and it was not the business slowing down. It was one lever. Funded promotions on Uber Eats had been cut back, and almost all of the lost orders came from those promo-attached orders. The full-price business held steady.
So the advice was the opposite of panic. Core demand is intact, so rebalance the promo — do not restore the whole budget.
The result: the next period, the group grew 9.2% in sales and 10.5% in orders, with every location up, and it did all of that while funding 25% less promo. Growth got cheaper. It also confirmed the diagnosis: sales rose even as promo fell, so the business was never promo-dependent and the cut was pure savings. Ratings held at 4.81 stars.